Author Profile — Lynn Hoffman Stirs Up Trouble With NRA

Posted on Saturday, June 14, 2008 at 09:56PM by Registered CommenterEditor | CommentsPost a Comment

DSCN0663.jpgAn interview with Lynn Hoffman, the author of the explosively controversial bang Bang "sure to enrage the NRA" writes Kirkus Reviews.

Lynn Hoffman’s bang Bang takes on guns in America. His writing might be described as adventuresome, sensitive, eclectic. Eclectic might also describe his many credentials: Ph.D. in anthropology, award-winning writer, executive chef, and expert in fine wines. Lynn’s previous published books include A Bachelor’s Cat. 


Q: So What you do to make the gun situation better?

A: Let me answer with a question: What would you do if you wanted to make it worse? Suppose that you were, oh, let's say The Devil, and you wanted more people to die from gunshots on the streets of Philadelphia. What would you do to make that happen?

Well, for starters, you'd make sure that there were lots more guns around. You'd get them sold in every gas station and corner store. You'd make them cheap and untraceable. If you couldn't make that legal in Philadelphia, you'd make it legal in the surrounding counties of this and other states. Then you'd encourage some free-enterprise by people buying guns out there and reselling them here.

The next thing you'd do is you'd make guns seem very sexy: sort of romantic. A Beretta would become a poor man's Boxster. You'd promote images of cool dudes carrying guns and occasionally using them to settle things with misguided, less cool people who challenged them. You might even write songs or make movies about the gun-runners who brought the little bang-BANGs to the streets. Oh, and you'd use sex to sell the idea. You'd have some hot pop-star look-alike on posters at the bus stop allowing that she really likes "a man with a nine. A Tek-Nine, that is."

I think that in one form or another, those things are already happening. There's not much that I can do, as a novelist to change the laws that make guns so easy to get. But what I can do, and what Paula Sherman can do and what you and that pop-star look alike can do is help change the dominant message about carrying a handgun.

Here's the new message: Handguns are for two kinds of people, cops and dorks. If you're carrying a gun and you're not a cop, then, well we know what you are. And we can't wait for you to get over it. That's the important message in bang BANG: real men don't play with guns and real women know that.

Gun deaths won't stop until we change the culture, so let's change the culture. Let's start now.

Q: When you wrote bang BANG, were you trying to make a political statement?

A: Not really. I wanted to talk about a woman who had been a victim and was now taking arms against a sea of troubles. I didn’t mind that I got a chance to poke fun at the gun lobbyists and the media in the process.

Q: Taking arms against a sea of troubles? So Paula Sherman is a kind of female Hamlet?

A: Maybe, but without the messy drowned-girlfriend part.

Q:It sounds like Paula is questioning the masculinity of 120,000,000 gun owners in America.

 A: No, not at all. First, she's not questioning the masculinity of  the women gun owners. Nor the hunters or the marksman. She's wondering about the men who feel that they have to have a couple of dozen guns around to feel like men and who feel that being asked to have a simple license would take away their precious bang-bangs. She wonders about the men who believe that crap so thoroughly that they're content to let a tide of illegal guns threaten the rest of us and our kids. You can't really blame her for wondering if there's a little pecker issue there.

Q: Paula gets excited by the shooting. How can you blame other people for being excited too?

 A: I don't. That's the point. There wouldn't be a problem with gun-owners in this country if shooting the damn things weren't fun. Paula knows that. There's also a point in her story where she decides to stop shooting, when she sees that she can get more accomplished without the gun.

Q: You've been a journalist, why is bang-BANG so hard on the media?

A: Actually, you don't have to be hard on the media, they do a pretty good job for you. It's not their fault really. We think of  media as responsible to the truth and in fact, they're responsible to their shareholders. That means that entertainmenttrumps information every time. Don't believe me? Well, think about this: name the five issues that you think are the most important to the welfare of the next generation. In other words, what questions are really going to matter to your kids and their kids. Got your list? Good. When was the last time you heard or read or saw a good story dealing with any of these issues?

Don't get mad at the journalists. They can't help it. The important stuff is necessarily complicated and complicated issues don't make good capsules or sound bites. Worse yet, you have to think about them. They  can be confusing and sometimes there's more than one answer. But if the fire department rescues a kitten in a tree, that's easy. You don't have to think, you can just react. That's satisfying and the media is mostly in the satisfaction business.

Incidentally, the right-wing critique of the media is spot on. What they're saying is that corporate communications doesn''t raise disturbing issues. Their definition of 'issues that ought to be raised' are different from mine, but the point is valid. Read any good stories about facing the trade deficit lately? What about the problem of an energy policy that leaves the non-OPEC countries politically independent of the oil barons? What? Not in today's paper? What a shock.

So in telling Paula's story in bang-BANG, it's hard not to imagine the media reaction. It's even harder not to see the media as central to Paula's struggle itself. It's only when Paula gets hip to the media  that her crusade really takes off.  So don't you wish that the guy in the picture up there on the left would put down the paper and look at the trees?bangbang.jpg

Numbers in Books Can Be Scary

Posted on Tuesday, November 13, 2007 at 07:30AM by Registered CommenterEditor | CommentsPost a Comment

The entire book industry is undergoing change, not just from the ongoing "adjustments" among superstores, online stores and independents, but from extreme pressure due to devaluing of the US dollar.

3000 Books Published Per Day in the United States Alone

According to Publishers Weekly: "Three thousand books are published daily in the U.S., and PW reviewed more than 6,000 of them in 2007."

Bookscan Numbers — Only 2.1% of Books Sold More than 5,000?

Nielsen Bookscan tracked 1.2 million titles in the United States; of  these, 79.6% sold fewer than 99 copies, 16.6% fewer than 1,000 copies, and only 2.1% more than 5000 copies. Bookscan data, however, is not the total picture, and its accuracy is quoted by Bookscan as 70-75% but as low as 20% by some publishers.

Publishers Weekly reports: "BookScan generally claims to represent between 70% and 75% of sales in the industry... But a comparison with in-print figures supplied by publishers reveals that the numbers are more likely to represent about 65%, even after deducting for unsold books and returns ... For some of the books, they ran as low as 25%."

 

Carol O'Dell is burning up the TV networks with her wit and charm

Posted on Friday, November 2, 2007 at 06:04PM by Registered CommenterEditor | CommentsPost a Comment

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

 
Carol D. O'Dell, author of Mothering Mother, is now a regular feature on CNN and FOX TV. Her live events are hugely popular as she speaks on living with Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease and elder care.

 In an interview with Carol O'Dell (no substitute for watching the CNN interview of course!), this heartwarmingly honest author reveals all.


mothering.pngWhat was the hardest part of writing Mothering Mother?
 
Writing Mothering Mother was challenging and cathartic. My situation as daughter and caregiver on top of other responsibilities was at times unbelievably stressful and bringing that physical and emotional pain to the page was an act of discipline and healing. Writing is a type of meditation, I suppose. It was tough to relive certain aspects of caregiving—both the sweet and bittersweet memories. I find that writing is emotionally exhausting but necessary if the work is to be of any worth. 

What made you decide that your mother should live with you?
 
From an early age, I had made a promise to my mother and father that I would care for them. My mother always had a fear of being put in “one of those homes.” I’m a big proponent of family. I think we should stay close to our loved ones at least for as long as it’s possible. I chose to rearrange my life, and had the family support to create this.  Realistically, I understand that some diseases take a toll and it may become impossible to offer home care. You’re still caregiving when you’re overseeing a loved one’s care—and there are stresses and challenges that accompany that situation as well.
 
Did you ever regret that decision?
 
Only once, when our youngest daughter became ill and had to be hospitalized. I felt I had not caught the symptoms in time because I had been so focused on my caregiving responsibilities.  Now I realize that I could have employed more help, but it was also about the mental climate of my home and how Alzheimer’s had pervaded the atmosphere. It’s very, very hard to stay above the emotional pull of this horrific disease. At that point, I began to seek more help and to consider a care facility, and it was also at that time that my mother took a turn for the worse.

Would you consider you and your mother close?
 
My mother and I and my family in general are like anyone else’s—with a tangled history, hurts and complications mixed in with love and compassion. Close is really a non-issue when it comes to caregiving. Caregiving is about integrity. It’s about the person who chooses to step up, take responsibility (and there are many ways to do that—financially, medically, emotionally, being the primary caregiver, one of many caregivers, or overseeing their care).
 
I did not take care of my mother because we were close. I did so because it was the right thing to do. Because we’re family. Because of the example I needed to set for my own children, and primarily because I have to get up and look in the mirror each morning.
 
What would you suggest to mothers and daughters who say, have unresolved issues?
 
Like many family members and caregivers, and thought I would have opportunities in those last years, weeks, months to “make things right.” I thought we’d have those heart-to-heart talks, forgive, get all cozy and feel at peace with each other. Did we? Yes, though not in the traditional sense, but in small, quiet ways.
I’d suggest that the best thing for mothers and daughters, fathers and sons, etc. to do is to simply accept each other just as you are. Illness, aging, and dying is not the time to try to fix things. It’s the time to love and simply be loved.
 
Was this experience somehow different because you were adopted?
 
No, I don’t think so. We were a family in every sense of the word.  I did and do feel a deep sense of gratitude for being adopted, but not in an obligatory way.
 
In your situation, there were no other siblings involved, but do you have any advice for those who are facing similar situations but have siblings to consider in the various decisions of caregiving?
 
 
I speak to Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, bereavement, and professional groups around the country, and I talk to many caregivers who are at odds with their siblings over issues of care. I know this can be a very hurtful situation. My advice is to accept the role you’re in—if you’re the primary caregiver because of your nurturing personality, or medical experience, or proximity to your loved one, or simply because no one else wants this responsibility, then accept this. Let go of your expectations of others. Offer mercy instead of demands. Most people recoil from caregiving not because of selfishness, even though it may appear that way. It’s usually fear: fear of intimacy, fear of not doing a good job, and the biggie—fear of death.
 
There’s nothing wrong in communicating and stating clearly what you need, ways that even long distance siblings or family members can still participate, but if they choose not to, then let it go. The inevitable fact is that most caregiving will eventually end in the passing of our loved one. There’s no reason to lose two family members.
 
What have you done/how have you felt about your relationship with your mother and the writing of this book since her passing?
 
Each day, and every time I give a presentation or speak to people at booksignings, I learn something new. I learn something about myself and our relationship. I’m more appreciative of my caregiving experience as time goes on, and even though I haven’t forgotten how very difficult it was at times, I’m grateful for the experience.
 
There are many personal aspects to your book, places where you and your mother are vulnerable in your thoughts and actions, were you ever concerned how people would react to this?


I wrote Mothering Mother as an act of survival. I wrote it because most of the caregiving related books I found were medically based and rarely touched on the personal ramifications as we come back together as family. I was a healthy, active vibrant 39 year-old when I chose to care for my mother full time. I still had (and have) a mind, body, heart, intellect and creative spirit that needed challenging.

I needed someone to be honest with me about the nitty-gritty side of caregiving, not the physical side per se, but the terrible, awful thoughts you have in moments of sheer desperation, well as those life-altering/decisions you are sometimes required/demanded to make in the course of caregiving that define you as a person. That’s why I wrote the book, to work through these head and heart issues, and to hopefully offer insight and comfort to those in similar situations. Aspects of Mothering Mother are for everyone. It’s about our relationships and how they define us.  Many of my readers are not caregivers, they’re simply readers who enjoy a good story and they understand how to apply these life lessons to their own situations.

I had to come to grips with “what will my mother/family/neighbors think of me.: After deciding that Mothering Mother could do more good than harm, and could help other caregivers feel less alone, I was able to be less concerned about what  people thought of me. I wanted others to laugh and cry and accept their lives, and risking my own vulnerabilities in order to relieve the stress and struggles of others seems like a good reason.

In writer terms, I decided to offer my emotions in real time—and wrote in vignette style (since caregivers are exhausted and are constantly interrupted). I created brief stories that would still fit into an overall story arc that would be a satisfying read as well as helpful. Writing engaged my intellect and creativity while I was in the thick of caregiving. I needed that. I needed to be able to think, analyze, observe and reflects.

 

Appendix Information

IN USA: $ 19.95    On Amazon $13.57

NEW Canadian Pricing! $21.95*


BIO026000 Biography & Autobiography / Personal Memoirs
FAM005000 FAMILY & RELATIONSHIPS / Aging
HUM011000 HUMOR / Topic / Family
Pages 208
ISBN-13: 978-1-60164-003-1
ISBN-10: 160164003X
EAN 9781601640031
LCCN 2006930184
Spring 2007
Kunati Cloth Hardcover